Repair: Asahi Super-Takumar 55mm f/1.8

Hello, everybody! I was enjoying some Vietnamese beers last weekend, the brands that I drank were light, smooth and refreshing. The beers were ice-cold and that helped make them taste a lot better. I love light beers, they won’t drown the taste of more-delicate flavors so they’re nice for pairing with seafood and vegetables or fruits. Just think of them as tasty palette-cleansers, preparing your tongue for the next bite. Today, I will show you something that’s just-as-smooth and like the Vietnamese beers I had they won’t cost you a lot and will definitely love you long time, too.

Introduction:

This version of the Super-Takumar 55mm f/1.8 was sold from 1965 to 1971 but this venerable lens family was sold from 1958 up to 1975 and were sold in under variations which makes them fun to collect. They’re quite popular so they have earned quite a following.

The barrel is all-metal which makes them tough, I’m sure they’ll survive some abuse in the field but they’re not sealed, I won’t recommend you using them in damp, rainy weather or anywhere dusty like the beach. The filter-size is 49mm, it’s the standard size for many Takumars and many M42 lenses at that time. It has a tab near the base so you can switch it from automatic to manual-aperture mode easily. It does have the tendency to be switched accidentally when you turn the aperture ring, resulting in inaccurate exposure.

More

Review: NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8

Hello, everybody! Do you like Charles Bronson? I like his movies, he broke the stereotype that leading men in movies all should be handsome and flawless. He showed how a regular-looking man could also have the same impact and give a movie something special. He inspired a lot of “flawed” heroes in our current movies and showed everyone that you do not need to look perfect to do a great job. Today, I’ll show you something that’s not perfect but it could certainly do its job with no problems at all.

Introduction:

The new NIKKOR Z MC 50mm f/2.8 was recently announced and it created a lot of interest, including mine. This is due to the fact that the AF-S Micro NIKKOR 60mm f/2.8G ED is already long-in-the-tooth and its replacement is overdue by several years. I wasn’t expecting to see a 50mm Micro-Nikkor, the last one that has that focal length is the first version which is the venerable (and rare) Micro-Nikkor 5cm f/3.5 of 1956. That is a big deal because 50mm should be ideal for a lot of things like product photography compared to the slightly-longer 60mm that we’re now used to.

It’s a compact lens, I was expecting this to be sold under the “S” line but it seems that marketing thought that this one ought to be a tier lower compared to the premium lenses. I don’t know the reason behind this but it is what it is. This is not an issue for me because that means there might be a chance to see another one which has better performance and weather-sealing in the near future.

More

Repair: Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 40mm f/4.5

Hello, everybody! Which Rocky movie is your favorite? I love the original one but part IV has a special place in my heart because Dolph Lundgren was there. It illustrated the rivalries between states during the Cold War, something my young readers won’t be able to comprehend. It was a nervous time even in the 1980s just before the former USSR collapsed. I recalled how weary I was because a nuclear war might happen anytime. I wasn’t born yet when it started in 1947 but I’ll introduce to you a witness to that. If this lens could only talk I would love to hear what it has to say about the stories it took just before the “Iron Curtain” went up. Let’s find out what this lens is all about.

Introduction:

The Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 40mm f/4.5 was made so that the Contax S and the Ihagee Exakta could have a lens that will go wider than 50mm. These predate Harry Zöllner and Rudolf Solisch’s Flektogon so Carl Zeiss Jena had to improvise a bit just to satisfy the need to get wider. If you’re an avid follower of this site you’d already know that it was difficult to design wider-lenses for 35mm SLR cameras back then so optical engineers had to resort to a few stop-gaps until there were suitable designs that could deliver what the market wanted which resulted in a few oddball lenses. This particular lens was made in the late 1940s and it represented that.

Construction is very good, the parts fit precisely and the level of machining is exceptional. The all-metal barrel is shiny with a thin coat of clear varnish. The iris could be stopped-down to f/22 which is not possible with the later version as far as I recall.

More

Repair: Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/3.5

Hello, everybody! I always love a great burger, last weekend I went to Kichijoji with my family and we all had burgers for lunch and dinner. For lunch, we ate at the biggest burger restaurant chain in the world and for dinner we had some great burgers from a new company which is the talk-of-the-town in recent months. Their patties tastes great, there are no extenders and the seasoning is all-natural and light which means you could taste the beef for what they really are. I loved every bite as the taste is clean on the palate. I won’t get tired of eating this classic comfort-food. Today, I’ll show you another classic, something that I never get tired off despite shooting with it many times over. Read this article and you’ll see what I mean.

Introduction:

The Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/3.5 came in many variations through the years that it was made, we’re going to talk about the one that was made from around 1950 to 1954 in the M42 mount. I consider this to be the epitome of what a true Tessar should be in terms of characteristics: sharp, small and reasonably well-corrected. It won’t be as desirable as the Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 or the Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58mm f/2 which are both faster but it has something special about it which you’ll see later. This was made as the budget 50mm from Carl Zeiss Jena, I saw an old catalog for Ihagee Exaktas and these were sold nearly 2x cheaper than a Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar 50mm f/2.8 and the most expensive lens in the 50mm range is of course the Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 58mm f/2 which costs several tens of 1950s dollars more. There was a need for to ensure that every part of the market is represented and this one became the go-to lens for the professional or amateur who just don’t have enough money to buy the more expensive options.

It’s a beautiful lens and the build is solid. It was made during a time when consumer products were made to last. It has a lot of useful information engraved on its barrel to aid you in focusing with it. The front element is recessed so you’re not going to need to shoot this with a hood.

More

Repair: Asahi Super-Takumar 50mm f/1.4 (8-elements)

Hello, everybody! Do you know Nagabuchi Tsuyoshi’s (長渕剛) song “Kanpai” (乾杯)? It means “cheers” literally and it is a beautiful song about friendship and coming-of-age, things to celebrate in every culture. I love the lyrics a lot because it evokes a lot of complex emotions and memories that we all have while growing up and finally reaching a point when we’ll have to look-forward to bigger things and face the grand stage of our lives. Today, I will show you something that is somewhat of a breakthrough for one company, it signals their arrival to the big boys’ club, once exclusive only to the elite of the optics industry and it’s something to celebrate, too. For this, I say “kanpai”!

Introduction:

The Super-Takumar 50mm f/1.4 was sold 1964 to 1966, it was hailed as Pentax’s best lens and rightfully so because this lens performs rather well. Engineering a 50/1.4 lens at that time meant that you’re part of an exclusive few who could actually manufacture something so complicated for its time that many companies made it their mission to design their own. It’s now trivial these days but back in its day these lenses were considered the peak of optical engineering. Pentax achieved this despite having to work with several handicaps like the lack of capital since it’s a smaller company and the M42 mount which made it difficult to design more ambitious lenses due to its narrow throat. Pentax overcame all that, presenting us with a masterpiece. This lens has a huge following, it has certainly achieved cult-status. It’s very goof but we’ll see just how good this is in our article. Many people who’ve reviewed this are biased towards this brand so I hope that I will be able to present a more balanced view of this lens despite the fact that I secretly love Pentax, too.

It appears to be single-coated, with a deep-amber hue common with many Japanese lenses of the same vintage. This is a lovely lens with its deep-knurled rings. Handling can be annoying, the auto/manual switch could be easily adjusted if you’re turning the aperture ring since there’s no lock for it. Even if you’ve just nudged it a bit that is enough to alter its operation if you’re not aware of it.

More

Repair: Cine-Nikkor 13mm f/1.8

Hello, everybody! Do you remember Fred Rogers? He is an amazing person who seem to see something good in all of the things that happen in this world. When an awful situation happens it’s nice to remember him and his show. There’s also a good story by Ajahn Brahmawanso about how he almost destroyed a brick wall just because there’s brick that’s not looking quite right. What stopped him was the thought that it’s not worth destroying a whole wall just for a single brick since the rest are obviously fine. In this life we’re sometimes faced with annoyance and it’s important to see some good in any situation. Today, I will show you a similar situation, I’ve received an item that is in otherwise good state but it has a blemish. Since it still sort of works fine I just focused on that fact instead of that blemish.

Introduction:

The Cine-Nikkor 13mm f/1.8 was sold from an unknown date. Judging from the types of the boxes I’ve seen these were probably sold from the 1960s to around the latter part of the 1970s and even possibly up to the 1980s. I’ve seen beige and even blue boxes for these. This lens filled an important part in Nikon’s C-mount lens catalog, it gives you a similar field-of-view of a 35mm lens on full-frame. While f/1.8 may sound bright it’s actually rather dim, being merely an f/4.8 lens in actual practice. You’ll have to remember that the 16mm format is smaller than 35mm so it gathers less light and you won’t get shallow depth-of-field with it unless you used a super-fast lens.

The barrel is engraved with all sorts of informative scales that will be useful for operating this lens. The mount is special in the sense that you can adjust its orientation so the centerline of the barrel will be visible to you. This is essential, not all camera brands will allow you to mount these lenses similarly so the ability to adjust its orientation is important.

More

Review: Yama Uchu-no-Katasumi 400

Hello, everybody! The pandemic has affected every person I know, mostly negatively. It has certainly affected our craft, we now have less opportunities to take photos. This sort of dampened my passion so I’m restricted to taking boring or repetitive photos. I’ve recently discovered a new film which I haven’t used or heard yet. It’s not expensive but it’s not a cheap stock either so I thought that I’d probably give it a shot. To my surprise, it’s actually rather nice and it has helped me enjoy photography again.

Introduction:

Today, we’ll take a look at Uchu-no-Katasumi (宇宙の片隅) or “A Corner of the Universe” in English. It’s made by Irohas, a small photography company based in Gunma, north of Tokyo. If you’re shopping for used cameras and lenses you’ve probably saw their name in the online auction sites. Click on this link to go to their website. This film is sold under their Yama brand, think of it as a Japanese equivalent of that big company that sells plastic cameras to people who pay a lot for a cup of drinkable cakes. Go to the Yama website to see what they’re all about.

What took my attention was the color of the box and its corny art. The name is also intriguing which made me curious. I was compelled to buy it because it’s priced decently at $6.50 for a 24-shot roll. I said decent since it should be sold at a lower price because it’s just 24-shots, if it’s 36-shots then you wouldn’t hear anything from me. I hate 24-shot rolls, I have to pay the same price to process and scan it compared to a 36-shot roll.

More